This is an article by
published by Spiked on 24th April 2019
Death for death’s sake
The attacks in Sri Lanka confirm we live in an era of barbarism.

"Here’s the most horrific thing from the barbaric assault on Christians and holidaymakers in Sri Lanka.
In the Zion Evangelical Church in the eastern city of Batticaloa, Christian children were gathered for Sunday school. Given it was Easter Sunday their teacher asked them a special question. ‘How many of you are willing to die for Christ?’ According to a teacher who survived what was about to happen, all the children put their hands up. The children then spilled out into the church grounds to play. Photos show them looking sunny and happy. Minutes later, an Islamist terrorist, who had failed to get into the church itself, walked among the group of children and blew himself up. Twelve children were killed. Many of their teachers were killed, too. Their crime was to be Christian.
Details like this demand an urgent and serious assessment of the phenomenon of Islamist terrorism. Because this terrorism, even by the historical standards of terrorism, is peculiarly hateful, misanthropic and barbaric. What drives someone to detonate a suicide belt while standing among children?
It brings to mind the suicide bomber who in July 2005 drove his car into a group of children who were accepting sweets from a US solider and blew himself up. Twenty-four children were killed. Or the female suicide bomber in Iraq in September 2006 who blew herself up among families who were queuing for kerosene. Try to imagine what happened next. A terrifying glimpse was offered by an eye-witness report in the Washington Post: ‘Two pre-teen girls embraced each other as they burned to death.’
It brings to mind the twin suicide bombings at All Saints Church in Peshawar in Pakistan in September 2013, when an Islamist extremist blew himself up among poverty-stricken Christian women and children who were queuing outside the church for a free meal, while his associate blew himself up inside the church where people ran to take cover. One-hundred-and-twenty-seven people were killed. And of course it brings to mind the Manchester Arena bombing of 2017, which faded strikingly fast from the forefront of the British political consciousness, in which an ISIS-inspired extremist blew himself up among parents and children leaving an Ariana Grande concert. The youngest victim was an eight-year-old girl. It’s likely many people in Britain don’t even know her name. It was Saffie Roussos.
These are only a handful of the thousands of acts of barbarism carried out by Islamist extremists in recent years. From the US to Europe, from the Middle East to the subcontinent, tens of thousands of people have been slaughtered by Islamist extremists. This terrorism seems to have utterly dispensed with the old rules of engagement. Its battleground is as likely to be a church or a school or a hospital or a queue of children as it is a piece of land claimed by an opposing military outfit. It follows no moral code whatsoever. Its defining feature is a glaring and terrifying absence of moral restraint. Anything is acceptable. Anyone can be killed. There is no code or rule or even basic human impulse that says to these groups: ‘Don’t do that. Not here. Not at a Sunday school.’
This means the new barbarism is very different to the violent groups that existed in the 1970s and 1980s. These outfits, like the PLO or the IRA, were usually, though not always, restrained by their own political motives and ambitions, contained and controlled by their own political beliefs. Their claim to represent a political outlook and a political constituency meant they tended to behave within a basic moral framework. Their claim to be serious political actors meant they carefully tailored and targeted their militaristic acts. Their acts of violence were frequently bloody, of course, but they rarely did what Islamist terrorists do today: seek to kill as many people as possible, ideally women and children, in a kind of perverse display of pornographic misanthropy, and with no higher aim than to devastate lives, communities and the human family more broadly.
For a few years now, some observers – not nearly enough – have tried to get to grips with the new barbarism, with this utterly unanchored, unrestrained, death-glorying violence. A 2005 New York Times piece titled, ‘The mystery of the insurgency’commented on Iraqi insurgents’ massacre of civilians and how historically unusual it was. This ‘surge in the killing of civilians’ reflects ‘how mysterious the long-term strategy remains’, it said. The writer arrived at a horrifying conclusion: that maybe there was no long-term strategy; that maybe killing civilians was the strategy, was the overriding aim. Death for death’s sake.‘Counter-insurgency experts are baffled’, said the NYT piece, because these civilian-targeting groups in Iraq had ‘developed no alternative government or political wing and displayed no intention of amassing territory to govern’.
Of course this changed later, with ISIS, which did amass territory. But even this contained within it ‘the mystery of the insurgency’, given that the Islamic State territory was defined by its perverse celebration of extreme violence which it recorded and distributed online. If anything, its territory looked less like a traditional state or guerrilla nation than a staging post for the internationalisation of ‘the surge in the killing of civilians’. A piece of land from which spectacles of deaths could be organised." (Source)
Gustav Mahler
Kindertotenlieder
Oft denk' ich, sie sind nur ausgegangen!
Bald werden sie wieder nach Hause gelangen!
Der Tag ist schön!
O sei nicht bang!
Sie machen nur einen weiten Gang!
Jawohl, sie sind nur ausgegangen
Und werden jetzt nach Hause gelangen!
O, sei nicht bang, der Tag is schön!
Sie machen nur den Gang zu jenen Höh'n!
Sie sind uns nur vorausgegangen
Und werden nicht wieder nach Hause verlangen!
Wir holen sie ein auf jenen Höh'n Im Sonnenschein!
Der Tag is schön auf jenen Höh'n!
___________________________________________
Often I think that they have only stepped out -
and that soon they will come home again!
The day is lovely-
O don't be afraid!
They are only taking a long walk.
Yes: they have only stepped out
and will now return home!
O don't be anxious - the day is lovely!
They are only taking a walk to those hills.
They have simply gone on ahead of us:
they will not wish to return home.
We'll catch up to them on those hills in the sunshine!
The day is beautyful on those hills.
(the translation is not mine)
PS.: 1
VladTepes explains the sheer repulsiveness of some reactions to this barbarism against non-muslims with his usual fine sense of irony:
2. Al Jazeera (*) explains to us that the real victims of muslims killing everyone all over the place in Sri Lanka, is muslims who are afraid someone might fight back.
(link to video:https://youtu.be/O4koEGGiL78 )
PS.: 2
I expect it from the Media-Floozy that is the PM of New Zealand (**), but I find it obscene that the future King of England should "honour" 50 muslim victims, continuing the HUGE global media saturation they have received over the past months while ignoring Christian victims at the very moment where near 300 of their dead, including many children are being buried.
https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6030110739001
(**)
Is Jacinda Ardern going to convert to Islam or will she continue to mock all Muslim women with her shameful pretense? keep in mind many women around the world are fighting back against the wearing of the Hijab & this fake isn't helping their course pic.twitter.com/1grFdNysqM— Lazza (@Lazza69676222) April 27, 2019
(*)The propaganda arm of Qatar, Al Jazeera, is the main "news source", ergo the perspective of Australia's National Broadcaster.



